I'm a lover of beautiful shoes, rockin dresses & spicy food. I'm a cook. Book junkie. Music lover & dancefloor enthusiast. Pop culture junkie. And I'm forever learning.
Wednesday 15 April 2009
Fashionjacker is neigh!!
I've just purchased our new web domains... watch this space fashionistas!!
of color in the fashion industry serves "aesthetic functions vital to robust competition." Under Wallace International Silversmith v Godinger Silver Art (1990), the test for aesthetic functionality in the Second Circuit Christian Louboutin Saleis "[W]here an ornamental feature is claimed as a trademark and trademark protection would significantly hinder competition by limiting the range of alternative designs, the ae
the bone structure of the face. It's like a beautiful face with no make-up. You can cover a not-so-beautiful face with make-up, but it is just a mask - it is the same with shoes."But that wasn't the only thing Louboutin told the crowd at the event, which was coordinated by Net-a-porter founder Natalie Massenet. "It makes the leg look longer," he said."[Toe cleavage] was something I discovered when
. The trial court rejected the shoemaker'sChristian Louboutin Pumps request to bar St. Laurent shoes with red soles, and Louboutin filed an appeal of that ruling in mid-October.In that appellate filing, Louboutin noted that the "Keds blue rectangle on the heel, the Burberry plaid, the Gucci stripes all act as trademarks because the consuming public has recognized them as indicators of source."New York-based Tiffany, which
e "largely because it relies on an occasional problem to justify a blanket prohibition."Nonetheless, the district court invoked this theory in order to deem the Red Sole Mark a "monopoly on the color red."Christian Louboutin Peep-toes Though the court posits "Louboutin would thus be able to market a total outfit in his red, while other designers would not," Louboutin's trademark registration specifically limits the red mark t
of color in the fashion industry serves "aesthetic functions vital to robust competition." Under Wallace International Silversmith v Godinger Silver Art (1990), the test for aesthetic functionality in the Second Circuit Christian Louboutin Saleis "[W]here an ornamental feature is claimed as a trademark and trademark protection would significantly hinder competition by limiting the range of alternative designs, the ae
ReplyDeletethe bone structure of the face. It's like a beautiful face with no make-up. You can cover a not-so-beautiful face with make-up, but it is just a mask - it is the same with shoes."But that wasn't the only thing Louboutin told the crowd at the event, which was coordinated by Net-a-porter founder Natalie Massenet. "It makes the leg look longer," he said."[Toe cleavage] was something I discovered when
. The trial court rejected the shoemaker'sChristian Louboutin Pumps request to bar St. Laurent shoes with red soles, and Louboutin filed an appeal of that ruling in mid-October.In that appellate filing, Louboutin noted that the "Keds blue rectangle on the heel, the Burberry plaid, the Gucci stripes all act as trademarks because the consuming public has recognized them as indicators of source."New York-based Tiffany, which
e "largely because it relies on an occasional problem to justify a blanket prohibition."Nonetheless, the district court invoked this theory in order to deem the Red Sole Mark a "monopoly on the color red."Christian Louboutin Peep-toes Though the court posits "Louboutin would thus be able to market a total outfit in his red, while other designers would not," Louboutin's trademark registration specifically limits the red mark t